data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5c59/e5c59a6ad7e785c6abfdc00daf26ba3e08ba864c" alt=""
The fact is that many respected men of God who have been studying theology longer and deeper than you have, will from time to time disagree with you. New Covenant Theology is no different. Many respected men disagree with us on this issue.
However, name dropping does not decide the truth of the matter. It is for this reason that there are a couple of debates (in writing) on the issue out on the web. Many of these are actually not in classic debate form, but rather in rebuttal form.
Have a look at this:
God's Kingdom Unrighteously Defended
Israel: An Unbelieving People and the response from Covenant Theology (CT).
The Problem with Radical Discontinuity from CT and the response from NCT.
In Defense of the New Covenant - A comprehensive response to Richard Barcellos’ book entitled, “In Defense of the Decalogue.”
A comprehensive review of Richard Barcellos’ “In Defense of the Decalogue” by John Reisinger:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5 - 4 cont.
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
Just in the last week, NCT has been called into question. You can find them here and here.
Update
First NCT Friday.
Next, NCT Friday: Branches of New Covenant Theology.
No comments:
Post a Comment