Monday, May 09, 2005

Kingdom of Heaven

In the world of Hollywood, fact and fiction are no different, as long as you tell a story; even if that story is supposedly based on history, which is supposed to be factual. This is true of movies such as Hard Ball and Pocahontas.

In the recently released movie Kingdom of Heaven, the movie makers take the facts of history, throw them into a hat and then pull them out in random order to make up this historical movie, and then sell it off as fact!

You see, I have always believed that the facts do not necessarily correlate to truth! Fact do not equal truth! Without context and perspective fact is merely raw data. Apply the context and perspective to fact and truth appears. In Kingdom of Heaven we can see this so clearly.


Background

Kingdom of Heaven mixes different facts of a century apart to make its story. In the movie Godfrey, protector of the king of Jerusalem and baron of Ibelin, returns to France to look for his illegitimate son, Balian, to lure him to Jerusalem to join Godfrey in the new world. On the way back to Jerusalem Godfrey dies and leaves Balian to be the new protector of the king of Jerusalem and to be the new baron of Ibelin. Back in Jerusalem Balian discovers that the king is a leper who has been king since his teenage years and who just may not see his 30th year alive. Balian falls in love with Sybilla, the king's sister, but later denies his love for her when he realises that this love could cause great evil in the empire. After the king dies Sybilla becomes queen and her husband Guy of Lusignan becomes her king. Guy, who is a bloodthirsty man decides that it is time for war against the Saracens (Muslims). He leads his army, without the warrior knights of Balian and Tiberias who felt that Guy's actions were uncalled for, against the army of Saladin who ruled an army of 200,000. Saladin obliterates the army of the new king of Jerusalem and decides that Jerusalem must be taken. When Balian hears of this he decides that it is worth defending Jerusalem against Saladin. However, Saladin takes Jerusalem and gives the people of Jerusalem safe passage out of Jerusalem.

Much of the story is based on fact. Godfrey existed and so did Saladin, Sybilla, the leper king of Jerusalem and Guy the bloodthirsty new king. However, Balian did not exist, and there were at least 87 years and two crusades that separated the lives of these people.

True context for the fall of Jerusalem

Godfrey (a descendant of Charlemagne in the female line), accompanied by his two brothers, Baldwin and Eustace, was the moral hero of the First Crusade. He is described as having prodigious physical strength. He was as pious as he was brave, and his single purpose was rescuing Jerusalem from the hands of the Saracens. Contemporary historians call him a holy monk in military armor and ornaments of a duke. Even his rivals acknowledged his purity. In a word, a very different person than pictured in Kingdom of Heaven. Being one of the stalwarts of the first crusade, he helped in securing Jerusalem on July 15, 1099. However, just eight days after the capture of Jerusalem Godfrey was elected king of Jerusalem but declined the title of king, since he was unwilling to wear a crown of gold in the same city where the Saviour had worn a crown of thorns. He rather adopted the title of Baron and Defender of the Holy Sepulchre. Having extended his own realm, and survived the capture of Jerusalem, Godfrey died a year later on July 18, 1100. He was recognised as the most devout among the chieftains of the first crusade and as a result his body was laid to rest in the church of the Holy Sepulchre.

Godfrey, after his death, was succeeded by his brother Baldwin as king of Jerusalem (1100-1118). Next came Baldwin II, the nephew of Baldwin I (1118-1131). The next ruler was Fulke of Anjou (1131-1143), the husband of Millicent, Baldwin II's daughter. After this followed Baldwin III (1143-1162). He saw the progress of the second crusade. Baldwin III was succeeded by Amalric of Amaury (1162-1173). The next king was Baldwin IV (1173-1184), a thirteen old boy who was a leper. Sybilla was his sister, who married Montferrat, one of the regents during the reign of Baldwin IV. It was during the reign of Baldwin IV that Saladin became the caliph over the whole realm of Damascus to the Nile. Baldwin V (1184-1186), the five year old nephew of Baldwin IV, was succeeded by Sybilla's second husband, Guy of Lusignan. Kingdom of Heaven depicts the battle between Guy and Saladin.

So, the creators of Kingdom of Heaven played fast and loose with the facts of the crusades by inserting Godfrey into a historic future in which he is simply the friend of the leprous king Baldwin IV, who reigned 73 years after Godfrey's own reign. Godfrey is also never depicted as the king of Jerusalem during this movie. The movie is also a depiction of the second crusade whereas Godfrey fought in the first crusade. Sybilla and her husband Guy also never succeeded Sybilla's brother directly, but rather followed Sybilla's five year old son, Baldwin V. This then also shows that there never could have been any antagonism between Guy and Godfrey, since they never could have known each other!

Hollywood's bias

Hollywood again shows its bias against Christianity in Kingdom of Heaven. The reasons for the crusades are not clearly shown and the Christians (under the leadership of Guy) are shown to simply want to go to war without any provocation. In fact, the Christians are shown to have provoked Saladin to come to war. On the other hand, the Muslims are shown to be the honourable ones and never to be the aggressors apart from when they are provoked. This clearly overlooks one of the main reasons for the start of the crusades.

Since the inception of Islam by the false prophet Mohammed, he and his followers have been involved in wars of great destruction against anyone who did not believe in Mohammed's message. This included Christians, Buddhists, Hindus and pagans. In the first century of Islamic jihad from Mohammed on, 3200 churches have been destroyed or converted into mosques. Thousands of Christians were massacred in this period alone. And it has not stopped. Men were forced to hand over their women and children to be sold as slaves. City upon city was invaded by hordes of Muslims who continued to slaughter the inhabitants of these cities. As recently as in "1860 over 12,000 Christians were slaughtered in Lebanon."[1] Later, in "1876 14,700 Bulgarians were murdered by the Turks."[2] Continuing in this trend, "200,000 Armenian Christians were slaughtered by the Turks in Bayazid in 1877. And in 1915 the Turks massacred over 1.5 million Armenian Christians. As recently as September 1922 the Turkish army destroyed the ancient city of Smyrna with its 300,000 Christian population."[3]

This had been "Mohammed's" rule since Islam's inception for close on 500 years when the crusades started. It simply came to a point where the Muslims could no longer be ignored. The fact that "Mohammed" tried to convert the world by the sword never even made it to this piece of celluloid.

Do not get me wrong, many atrocities were committed by many of the so-called "Christians" on these crusades. This we do not deny. Yet, many of these same atrocities were committed by the armies of Islam for almost 500 years but we are never informed of them in this movie.

Because this is a historic epic, many unsuspecting viewers will leave the theatre believing that what they saw to be truth. Yet, this movie simply produces the "truth" of the warped worldview of its makers. It passes the many mixed up facts as truth. However, it never brings us truth, but rather stores in the minds of the viewers a rewritten historic concoction of half truths and innuendo.

To learn more about the crusades and what led to them, read The Real History of the Crusades by Thomas F. Madden.



Not all is bad

Even though Kingdom of Heaven is historically inaccurate there is some good we can take from this movie. It is a movie of honour, bravery and consequences. Balian's brave stand against the Saracens is shown to be a stand of honour, since he and his men promised the king to protect those that cannot be protected. Even Saladin is shown to be honourable in his dealings with the king. A deal was struck between the king and Saladin as to who rules where. Saladin never seems to have gone against this deal. The consequences of wrong actions are also shown when we see the end of Guy, who succeeded the leper king. He was not an honourable man. He was also a man of bloodlust. He ended losing his kingdom and had nowhere to go.

Conclusion

This movie is not for someone who is sensitive. Whenever a battle is on the go, blood is splattered across the screen and onto those in battle. However, the violence and blood cannot be compared to that of garbage like Kill Bill. If you are interested in an accurate historical movie, this is also not for you, especially if you are a history buff.

All in all the movie is good in terms of the story and the special effects. But, like most other historic epics produced by Hollywood such as Troy, King Arthur and Alexander, Hollywood gets it wrong once again!




1. Peter Hammond, The End of Islam, http://www.frontline.org.za/news/end_of_islam.htm
2. Ibid.
3. Ibid.

Bibliography

Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Volume 5, The Middle Ages, From Gregory VII to Boniface VIII, 1049-1294, Hendrickson Publishers, Peabody, Massachusetts, First Printing, July 1996.


Update:
30 November 2009 - After I received a correction from Anonymous, on Sat, 28 November 2009, concerning Balian, I thought it best to put a link to my correction concerning Balian that I wrote back on 18 May 2005 called Kingdom of Heaven Correction.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Since the inception of Islam by the false prophet Mohammed, he and his followers have been involved in wars of great destruction against anyone who did not believe in Mohammed's message. This included Christians, Buddhists, Hindus and pagans."

wow. congratulations on producing several layers of stupidity. if you knew anything about islamic / christian relations you would know that statement is completely backwards. Islam is about submitting to god and living righteously you have an extreme bias. all the religions you just named lived peacefully under islamic rule, more so than christian / roman catholic rule eg. at one point a death penalty for not being baptised.

p.s. im american and im raised catholic. sometimes it helps to look from the outside instead of your realm of bias.

William Dicks said...

I wonder which rewritten history you have read and what Politically Correct (should I say Islamic Correct) history you have read? The fact is that Mohammed himself led by the sword. People either converted to Islam, or were put to death or taken into slavery. That was Mohammed's way!

Anonymous said...

Uhmmm, I think you should read up a little bit more, and maybe try to not interpret the fruits of your research so selectively. Just a thought...

William Dicks said...

Excellent comment, Anonymous! ?!

Anonymous said...

Please don't tell me that you attempts to make a living from writing. You really are an abismal writer, and should probably focus more so on attempting to get your facts correct, or your sentances somehow intelligible.

Good luck to you; you need it.

Anonymous said...

Self-correction: "please don't tell me that you attepmt..."






By the way, I am a 15 year old Ancient History student. Sources like you are embarassing.

Anonymous said...

Ha ha, I apologise once again for my shocking typing skills.

What I mean to type is "attempt".

Anonymous said...

Wow that Ancient History Student is amusing.

I agree in the unmost.

Don't quit your day job (hopefully writing isn't it).

William Dicks said...

It seems like 'anonymous' is quite a popular name.

Be that as it may. Ancient History Student makes easy comments for someone at 15 being an 'Ancient History Student!'

I can't write. So what! Is that all you can say?

Your comments really do not add anything to the conversation here.

It is no use me saying the moon is white and you say the moon is blue but give no backing for your point of view. When I was 15 I used those types of arguments. 'Is! Isn't! Is! Isn't!'

It is simply not helpful and comes off as truly juvenile.

Anonymous said...

Yes anonymous is a rather popular name these days. I think i myself will use it. Why ever not.

I find the fact that you are arguing with a 15 year old rather amusing. Even if they are or aren't an Ancient History student, why would it matter? Because they have insight to the world of Ancient History? *shocked face*

They aren't offending you personally, just critiquing your article.

Keep trying; mabye just don't take every little comment to heart. The best way to beat kids is to "roll" with them.

Crusader said...

The Islamic Ottoman Government of Turkey was overthrown by Masonic Jewish socialist, who deceptively called themselves, the "Young Turks."

The horrific murder of 2 million Armenians was carried out by "cryptic" Jews under Atta Turk, an alcoholic Crypto-Jew dictator who was financed by Rothschild and Shiff. This was a dress rehearsal for the Bolshevik overthrow of Czarist Christian Russia.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070525134105AAzjOIx

This is just one small example of the deception of Zionist plans to destroy Christianity by blaming it all on the Muslims!

I'm Irish Catholic and Ireland is still reeling from the Jewish Merchants and Bankers out of Holland that financed Cromwell's Revolution. He stated "I am a Hebrew", invaded Ireland and established Her as a 500 year long "plantation" of England and also executed Charles I, who, it is believed, converted to Catholicism before he was beheaded.

This is just the tip of the Zionist iceberg.

No Muslim ever hurt me.

Anonymous said...

just to let you know you should really research you characters. Balian was a real person and did in fact help defend Jerusalem. Also, he and Saladin were friends and he negotiated the surrender with him..

William Dicks said...

Hi latest "Anonymous:"

See my blog post of May 18, 2005, Kingdom of Heaven Correction.

Saieef ahmdya said...

So Good post and i will follow you Blog and i hope to follow my blog AncientGreece.Me and see more about Spartan Government thanks a gain admin ,,,

Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin